My opening statement to the jury
1). Ladies and Gentlemen this is not a case where the prosecutor’s office is seeking justice rather it involves someone
(the complainant) who has a “
personal vendetta” against me and the prosecutor’s office is helping the complainant,
Tamara Shamansky [hereinafter “
Shamansky”], carry out that “vendetta.”
2). In criminal trials attorneys often argue (so-called) “
prior bad acts” can’t be brought up because it would influence a
jury to convict a defendant. Well, I’m the defendant and I’m going to be bringing up those (so-called) “
prior bad acts
and it will be the prosecution that objects to me doing that. Their reason for doing so will be based on the fact that you
will see “
irrefutable documented evidence” of a level of police corruption that is not only incomprehensible but down
right “evil” based on the fact that this all started when my mother was dying of breast, bone and brain cancer and then
it continued even after her death and Shamansky and the Delaware Police [hereinafter “
DP”] knew my mother was
dying/had died and that didn't even stop them from doing to me what I'm about to tell you and none of it can be
disputed because it's corroborated with Shamansky's recanted under oath statements that contradict (her initial
statements) and prove false the DP's own documentation of an investigation of a false stalking/phone harassment
complaint Shamansky filed against me for eight (8) months.
3). After Shamansky, a relative of an (
1) ex-Delaware County [hereinafter “DC”] Municipal Court [hereinafter “MC”]
referee, (2) saw me in DC with my mother to see her oncologist we began receiving "prank" calls from her. I never
parked across the street from her house. My mother got sick (she often did riding in a car) and I had to pull over and
did so just into the entrance of the development where Shamansky lived. At the time I didn’t know (or care) where she
lived. I didn’t know if she recognized me until we started receiving “
prank” calls from her.
4). After receiving the “
prank” calls from Shamansky I sent her a letter telling her my mother was dying of breast, bone
and
brain cancer and I didn’t want any trouble if she saw us again in DC (for my mother’s medical needs) hoping that
would be the end of it. (
3) After receiving that letter Shamansky filed a stalking/ harassment complaint against me.
Then a DP officer, William Zoller [hereinafter “
Zoller”], (4) contacted me and I agreed not to contact Shamansky again
hoping that was the end of it. Unbeknownst to me it wasn’t.
5). Before I proceed with what Shamansky and the DP did to me when my mother was dying and then they continued
even after her death I want to tell you what it took for me to care for my mother as her “
primary caregiver.” I had to
take her to chemotherapy treatments (often carrying her to and from bed), pick up medications for her, sponge bathe
her, help her to and from the bathroom (including wiping her) and change adult diapers when she became bedridden.
Remember that throughout as I proceed with what Shamansky and the DP did to me.
6). Throughout the course of an eight (8) month investigation of a false stalking/phone harassment complaint
Shamansky filed against me she violated the (
5) menacing by stalking statute (2903.211) of the Ohio Revised Code
[hereinafter “
ORC”] by engaging in a pattern of conduct (falsely accusing me of stalking/phone harassment) knowing it
would cause me “
mental distress” while I was caring for my dying mother.
7). During that investigation Shamansky also violated the (
6) falsification statute (2921.13) of the ORC by knowingly
making false statements (
7) (we never dated and I was stalking/harassing her by phone) in an official proceeding
(investigation) with the purpose of incriminating me of stalking/harassing her by phone and mislead a public official in
performing his official function.
8). During that investigation the DP, i.e., former detective and current DC Sheriff Russ Martin [hereinafter “
Martin”],
and Zoller also violated the falsification statute of the ORC by knowingly documenting false statements made by
Shamansky (we never dated so I’d be perceived as nothing more than a “
former acquaintance” who was “obsessed
with Shamansky and I was stalking/harassing her by phone) in an official proceeding (investigation) with the purpose of
incriminating me of stalking/harassing Shamansky by phone after I was proven innocent of doing that.
9). Martin and Zoller also violated the (
8) tampering with evidence statute (2921.12, a “3rd degree felony”) of the ORC
by using official DP documents knowing they were false and with the purpose to mislead a public official who is or may
be engaged in such proceeding or investigation, i.e., Martin and Zoller used DP reports Zoller falsified (
9) (11-24-98
and (
10) 6-23-99 DP reports) as the “probable cause” to obtain a warrant for Shamansky’s phone records (that
definitively proved I was innocent of stalking/harassing Shamansky by phone and she was guilty of menacing by
stalking (me) and falsification)..
10). Martin and Zoller also violated the (
11) dereliction of duty statute (2921.44) of the ORC by failing to prevent or halt
the commission of an offense or to apprehend an offender (Shamansky), when it was in their power to do so as law
enforcement officers and by doing so negligently failed to perform a lawful duty in a criminal case after Shamansky’s
phone records definitively proved I was innocent and she was guilty of violating the menacing by stalking and
falsification statutes (2903.211, 2921.13) of the ORC.
11). Most of that was done with the intent of incriminating me of committing a crime against Shamansky (after I was
proven innocent of what she accused me of) with the intent of having me incarcerated and not be there to care for my
mother or grieve her death and (
12) on one occasion just 19 days before she died.
12). To give you an idea how serious Martin and Zoller’s violation of the dereliction of duty statute was Martin himself
(
13) suspended a DP officer for violating dept. policies and ethics violations for just failing to investigate a suspected
crime (DUI) committed by a fellow DP officer’s daughter after her mother told a police dispatcher her daughter had
been drinking before crashing her car into two (2) parked cars. The DP officer Martin suspended said he did that as a
professional favor” to her DP officer father.
13). Martin and Zoller’s violations of dept. policies and ethics violations were far more serious seeing as how they
uncovered evidence (Shamansky's phone records) of crimes (ORC 2903.211, 2921.13) Shamansky committed against
me while investigating the crime she falsely accused me of, i.e., (
14) telecommunications harassment (ORC statute
2917.21), and never charged her with those crimes.
14). In another case (
15) 2 DC Deputy Sheriff’s were charged with dereliction of duty for not charging a motorist with
DUI and (16) Martin eventually fired those 2 DC Deputy Sheriff’s for being deceptive, not forthcoming and providing
false information in the computer aided dispatch system.
15). That’s the exact same thing (paragraph 14) Martin and Zoller did only their deceptions, not being forthcoming to
me about crimes Shamansky committed against me and providing false information in the DC crimes management
computer system were far more serious seeing as how they were covering up crimes Shamansky committed against me
and falsely incriminating me of committing the crime she falsely accused me of (telecommunications harassment).
16). Those 2 deputies Martin fired weren’t covering up crimes committed by someone engaging in criminal activity by
falsely accusing an innocent person of committing a crime with the intent of having them incarcerated like he and Zoller
were they just didn’t charge a person with DUI.
17). All you have to do is look at the DP reports Zoller falsified to know I was innocent. 2½ months before my mother
died (
17) Shamansky told Zoller Judy Young and I were related (we are not) and I used her phone to stalk/harass her. I
called Judy Young at the number in Zoller’s DP report and she told me no one from the DP ever contacted her
regarding Shamansky’s claim her caller ID recorded Judy Young’s phone number. I wasn’t contacted either.
Shamansky got Judy Young’s name/number out of the phone book and proceeded to falsely accuse her of being an
accomplice to the crime she was falsely accusing me of for no other reason than we shared the same last name. A
month later (
18) Shamansky tried to file that false charge against me again and was told there was no criminal offense
but charges could be filed against me if there was “verifiable contact” again. (19) A month later (and just 19 days
before my mother died) Shamansky tried to file that false charge against me again and when the DP wouldn’t file that
charge she contacted her attorney to pursue that false charge on her own. Four (4) months after her attorney failed to
bring charges against me (
20) Shamansky tried to file that false charge against me again with the DP. Despite Zoller
saying that he witnessed “verifiable contact” by me again on Shamansky’s caller ID dating back “several months” from
6-23-99 I wasn’t charged with, let alone even questioned about, stalking/ harassing Shamansky by phone after her
phone records were obtained with a warrant. Original DP reports
10-20-98, 11-24-98, 12-17-98, 2-5-99, 6-23-99.
18). (
21) Further proof that complaint was false is Shamansky admitted under oath she never determined who called
her despite Zoller’s DP reports proving Shamansky (lied and) said the calls were made from Judy Young and my
mother’s phone numbers.
19). (
22) Even further proof that complaint was false is Shamansky lied/testified under oath the stalking/harassment
complaint she filed against me was by mail (after I agreed not to contact her again, paragraph 4) when (23) Zoller was
filing DP reports that say Shamansky was filing a stalking/phone harassment complaint against me.
20). Even further proof that complaint was false is shortly after my mother died on 2-9-99 all her household accounts
were closed and reopened in the executor’s (my sister’s) married name (Wendy Brozovich) and address for payment
until her home sold. We had the phone number changed to an “
unlisted number” in her name. Shamansky and Zoller
both said my mother’s name and phone number showed on her caller ID 2-4½ months after it was cancelled and
changed to an “
unlisted number” in my sister’s married name.
21). That false stalking/phone harassment complaint was never mentioned again in any subsequent DP reports and I
was never contacted by anyone from the DP to tell me I was the victim of a crime Shamansky committed to see if I
wanted to file criminal charges against her. I would’ve wanted menacing by stalking and falsification criminal charges
filed against Shamansky.
22). That all being said (paragraph 17-21) Martin and Zoller used Zoller’s falsified DP reports incriminating me of
stalking/harassing Shamansky by phone (paragraph 7, link
7) as the “probable cause” to obtain a warrant for
Shamansky’s phone records. A “
3rd degree felony” under the ORC’s tampering with evidence statute (2921.12,
paragraph 9, link
8).
23). Throughout the course of the eight (8) month investigation of the false stalking/phone harassment complaint
Shamansky filed against me I committed no crimes whereas Shamansky committed two (2) crimes against me
(menacing by stalking and falsification) with the latter one intended to have me incarcerated for up to six (6) months,
Zoller committed three (3) crimes against me (falsification, tampering with evidence and dereliction of duty) and one
was a “
felony” (tampering with evidence) and (24) Martin, as the lead detective investigating the false stalking/phone
harassment complaint Shamansky filed against me, committed one (1) crime (dereliction of duty) and being complicit in
all of Zoller’s crimes as lead detective supervising the investigation of Shamansky’s false complaint.
24). Before I proceed it should be “
duly noted” Martin was quoted as saying, (25) “I think it’s just incumbent of law
enforcement to treat everybody the same. It’s just a real simple concept” six (6) years after he, as lead detective
investigating the false stalking/phone harassment complaint Shamansky filed against me, supervised Zoller falsifying
DP reports with the intent of incriminating me of stalking/harassing her by phone with the intent of having me
incarcerated and not be there to care for my mother or grieve her death after proving I was innocent and she was
guilty of menacing by stalking (me) and falsification.
25). You’d think someone who claimed to think that way (paragraph 24) would’ve arrested Shamansky after her phone
records proved I was innocent and she was guilty of menacing by stalking me and falsification especially when you
factor in (
26) Martin filed falsification charges against a man who just lied about stealing and (27) after pleading guilty
he was facing up to six (6) months in prison and a $1,000 fine.
26). That’s not at all what happened. In fact, more crimes were committed against me by Shamansky, Martin and Zoller
after I was proven innocent and Shamansky was guilty of menacing by stalking (me) and falsification. Instead of Martin
closing the investigation and being true to his words (paragraph 24) and treating Shamansky and I the same by filing
criminal charges against her or, at the very least, threaten to if she didn’t stop falsely accusing me of stalking/
harassing her by phone and respect my privacy with the recent death of my mother (
28) Zoller falsified a DP report
incriminating me of stalking/harassing Shamansky’s husband by mail the same exact day their phone records proved I
was innocent and Shamansky was guilty of menacing by stalking me and falsification.
27). Zoller falsified that DP report after Martin confronted Shamansky and asked her why she filed a false stalking/
phone harassment complaint against me and (
29) Shamansky told Martin it was because when we met she was
prostituting herself through an escort service and that’s how we met and she continued seeing me as a prostitute (but
our relationship never went beyond that) and I had become “obsessed” with her to the point she had to stop seeing me
and now feared her past as a prostitute would be revealed by me now that I knew where she lived.
28). Before I proceed I need to point out I never denied meeting Shamansky through an escort service only I didn't set
it up. A friend did. We both knew her from high school and he told me he could fix me up with her but didn't tell me how.
When I found out how (she propositioned me for
$$$) I ended the date. (30) After that Shamansky pursued me almost
immediately and I only agreed to go out with her because she told me she quit working for the escort service.
29). For the record, (
31) I ended the relationship when I found out Shamansky was cheating on me (32) with a man
twice her age (old enough to be her father) and prostituted herself the whole time we dated. Everyone knows
(
33) the "self-incriminating act" (34) related to working for an escort service is "PROSTITUTION!!!"
30). It's worth mentioning Shamansky was prostituting herself less than six (6) months before she got married. She was
married in 1995 and I stopped seeing her in February 1995. The fact that didn't deter the guy she married and she
was prostituting herself less than six (6) months before she got married tells me he was one of her “
clients/John's
when she was a prostitute. A fascinating story they can tell their child and grandkids about how they met.
31). (
35) Shamansky initially denied ever being associated with an escort service. (36) Shamansky admitted under
oath lying initially about me being one of her “John’s” when she was a prostitute. (37) Shamansky also admitted under
oath lying about never being associated with an escort service and never dating me by describing our relationship as
just a regular “boyfriend/girlfriend” one and (38) said we’d go out all the time.
32). After Shamansky lied to Martin about me being one of her “
John's” when she was a prostitute and Zoller falsified
that DP report incriminating me of stalking/harassing Shamansky’s husband by mail Martin stalked my sister by
contacting her ex-husband and an “
abusive” ex-boyfriend she never wanted to hear from again (he called my sister).
33). After finding that out (paragraph 32) I sent Shamansky/her husband a letter telling Shamansky to stop whatever
she was doing that prompted Martin to cause my sister “
mental distress” by contacting the “abusive” ex-boyfriend she
never wanted to hear from again.
34). Instead of doing that (
39) Shamansky altered those letters (40) to incriminate me in prostitution with her to
corroborate her lying to Martin previously about me being one of her “
clients/John's” when she was a prostitute
(paragraph 27) and then gave them to Martin.
35). After that (paragraph 34) Martin harassed my sister at work threatening to arrest me if I didn’t talk to him about the
letters I sent. I agreed but only if my sister was allowed to be present. She was. When we spoke Martin never told me
about Shamansky stalking me for eight (8) months by filing a false stalking/ phone harassment complaint against me.
Instead Martin made excuses for Shamansky lying to both him/Zoller, i.e., (
41) “she was trying to turn her life around”
(from previous criminal activity/prostitution) and “she was lying, she’s not lying anymore.”
36). Notice in that last document (paragraph 35, link
41) Martin told my sister and I he contacted her ex-husband and
the “
abusive” ex-boyfriend for “background information” on her (my sister) because he needed to know how to
approach her. Martin needed to know how to approach my sister after his and Zoller's investigation concluded I was
innocent and Shamansky was guilty of menacing by stalking (me) and falsification three (3) months earlier.
37). In the latter excuse (Shamansky was trying to turn her life around from previous criminal activity/prostitution)
Martin was only referring to Shamansky lying about never dating me since she now (lied and) claimed I was one of her
John's” when she was a prostitute and our relationship never went beyond that. Shamansky was still lying
(paragraph 31, link
37, 38).
38). After interviewing me Martin served me with a (
42) summons charged me with menacing by stalking for sending
Shamansky letters after he stalked my sister by contacting her “
abusive” ex-boyfriend (when he should’ve been
arresting Shamansky) and served me with a summons to appear in DCMC and also gave me his business card and
said I could call him if I had any questions.
39). I was “
provoked” into doing that (paragraph 38) by Martin stalking/harassing my sister/causing her “mental
distress
” by contacting her ex-husband and the “abusive” ex-boyfriend she never wanted to hear from again (he
called her) instead of respecting my family’s privacy with the recent death of our mother.
40). If you look at that summons (paragraph 38, link
42) Martin said I continued sending Shamansky letters from Oct.
‘98 to Oct. ‘99 even after Zoller told me to stop (paragraph 4). That’s a “
flat out, bald faced lie” and proven so with
Zoller’s DP reports by there being no mention of letters in any of Zoller’s DP reports from (
43) Nov. ‘98 to June (23) ‘99.
41). In order to corroborate that summons (
44) Martin tampered with evidence/blurred the date stamps on envelopes
containing the letters I sent Shamansky/her husband so I wouldn’t be able to prove I sent them after their phone
records proved my innocence, Shamansky committed the crimes of menacing by stalking me and falsification against
me and Martin stalked my sister when he should’ve been arresting Shamansky instead.
42). Notice the insert for the window envelope is on the wrong side of the window and would not have been deliverable
and the only date stamp that is “
legible” is dated three (3) months after Shamansky's phone records proved I was
innocent and she was guilty of menacing by stalking me and falsification.
43). I go back to Martin charging me with menacing by stalking instead of Shamansky. That being said it's only logical
to conclude Martin felt the real criminal was the person (me) Shamansky falsely accused of stalking her while she was
stalking them (me) and DP reports had to be (and were) falsified to reflect that.
44). Having no knowledge of Shamansky stalking me for eight (8) months by filing a false stalking/phone harassment
complaint against me to defend myself against what Martin charged me with I pled “
no contest” and was sentenced to
thirty (30) days jail time with twenty-five (25) days suspended in favor of a year of probation.
45). If you analyze what Martin and Zoller did after Shamansky's phone records proved I was innocent and she was
guilty of menacing by stalking me and falsification and Martin and Zoller were guilty of falsification, tampering with
evidence (a “
felony”) and dereliction of duty while investigating the false stalking/phone harassment complaint
Shamansky filed against me for eight (8) months they committed six (6) more crimes (including two (2) “
felonies”) for a
“grand total” of twelve (12) crimes with three (3) of them being “
felonies.”
46). Shamansky violated the “
falsification” statute (2921.13, paragraph 7, link 6) of the ORC again by knowingly
making false statements (I was one of her “
John’s” when she was a prostitute) in an official proceeding (investigation)
with the purpose of incriminating me (in her own criminal activity/prostitution) and misleading a public official in
performing his official function.
47). Shamansky violated the “
tampering with evidence” statute (2921.12, a “felony” paragraph 9, link 8) of the ORC
by altering documents (the letters I sent her, paragraph 34, link
39, 40) with the purpose of impairing their value as
evidence in an investigation and then presented those documents to Martin knowing they were false with the purpose
of misleading a public official engaged in an investigation with a further purpose of corrupting the outcome of said
investigation.
48). I couldn't possibly be the author of those letters seeing as how Shamansky admitted under oath she lied to Marin
and Zoller when she told them I was one of her “
John's” when she was a prostitute (paragraph 31, link 36) and our
relationship never went beyond that (paragraph 31, link
37).
49). That’s four (4) crimes Shamansky committed (paragraph 6-7, 46-47) and one was a “
felony”  (paragraph 47).
50). The same exact day Shamansky’s phone records proved I was innocent and she stalked me for eight (8) months
by filing a false stalking/phone harassment complaint against me Zoller violated the “
falsification” statute (2921.13,
paragraph 7, link
6) of the ORC again by knowingly making false statements (I stalked/harassed Shamansky’s husband
by mail, paragraph 26, link
28) in an official proceeding (investigation) with the purpose of incriminating me of
stalking/harassing Shamansky’s husband.
51). That’s four (4) crimes Zoller committed (paragraph 8-10, 50) and one was a “
felony” (paragraph 9).
52). After Shamansky’s phone records proved I was innocent and she stalked me for eight (8) months by filing a false
stalking/phone harassment complaint against me Martin violated the “
falsification” statute (2921.13, paragraph 7,
link
6) of the ORC by making false statements (I continued sending Shamansky letters from Oct. ‘98 to Oct. ‘99 even
after Zoller told me to stop, paragraph 4) in an official proceeding (investigation) with the purpose of incriminating me
of stalking/ harassing Shamansky.
53). Martin also violated the “
menacing by stalking” statute (2903.211, link 5) of the ORC by engaging in a pattern of
conduct knowing it would cause another (my sister) “
mental distress” (he contacted my sister's “abusive” ex-boyfriend
who she never wanted to hear from again and he contacted my sister to tell her Martin contacted him).
54). Martin also violated the “
tampering with evidence” statute (2921.12, a “3rd degree felony” link 8) of the ORC by
making a document (the summons he served me with, paragraph 38, link
42) knowing it was false with the purpose of
misleading a public official who is or may be engaged in such proceeding or investigation with a further purpose of
corrupting the outcome of his investigation of the false stalking/phone harassment complaint Shamansky filed against
me for eight (8) months.
55). Martin violated the “
tampering with evidence” statute (2921.12, a “3rd degree felony” paragraph 9, link 8) of the
ORC a 2nd time by altering documents (USPS date stamps on the envelopes, paragraph 41, link
44, containing the
letters I sent Shamansky so I couldn’t prove I sent them after her phone records proved I was innocent and she stalked
me for eight (8) months by filing a false stalking/phone harassment complaint against me and after Martin stalked my
sister when he should’ve been filing criminal charges against Shamansky) with the purpose of impairing their value as
evidence in such proceeding (investigation) with a further purpose of corrupting the outcome of his and Zoller's
investigation of the false stalking/phone harassment complaint Shamansky filed against me for eight (8) months.
56). That’s four (4) crimes Martin committed (paragraph 10, 52-55) and two (2) were “
felonies” (paragraph 54-55).
57). That’s twelve (12) crimes committed by Shamansky, Martin, Zoller (paragraph 6-10, 46-47, 50, 52-55) and they
were all committed after Martin and Zoller’s eight (8) month investigation of the false stalking/ phone harassment
complaint Shamansky filed against me proved I was innocent and she was guilty of menacing by stalking me for eight
(8) months and falsification.
58). While on probation (
45) my mental health was questioned by Martin when I tried calling him at the number on the
business card he gave me (and said I could call him if I had any questions, paragraph 38) and left messages asking for
copies of the DP reports Shamansky filed when she was stalking me for eight (8) months by filing a false
stalking/phone harassment complaint against me to see if I had cause for a civil action.
59). After listening to those messages (
46) Martin contacted Shamansky and she told him if I did file a civil action she
wouldn’t be able to lie and corroborate the DP reports Zoller falsified because (
47) my family would testify she lied
about never dating me, (48) lied about me stalking/harassing her by phone for eight (8) months and (49) lied about me
being involved in prostitution with her.
60). It's worth mentioning again Shamansky lied under oath by claiming the stalking/harassment complaint she filed
against me for nine (9) to twelve (12) months was by mail (paragraph 19, link 22) (
50) despite Zoller's DP reports
proving the false stalking/harassment complaint she filed against me for the first eight (8) of those nine (9) to twelve
(12) months was by phone.
61). After Shamansky told Martin she couldn't lie to corroborate the DP reports Zoller falsified to read we never dated
and incriminate me of stalking/harassing her by phone Martin contacted the probation officer assigned to me, Faith
Cole [hereinafter “
Cole”], and told her about the crimes he and Zoller committed with the intent of covering up the
crimes Shamansky committed against me.
62). After Martin told Cole that (paragraph 61) Cole caused another court proceeding to be brought against me and
(
51) she and Martin testified I should undergo a “psychological evaluation” with follow-up treatment if necessary
because they both said my requests for copies of the DP reports Zoller falsified was really just a continuation of my
“obsession” with the victim (Shamansky) and I was ordered to undergo a “psychological evaluation.”
63). It should be “
duly noted” Cole was a probation officer for the same court Shamansky’s relative (paragraph 3,
link
1) was a referee in and Cole told me she knew Shamansky’s relative and worked with her on a daily basis.
64). Before I proceed I should point out Zoller’s DP reports are “
irrefutable documented evidence” of Shamansky
being “
obsessed” with me. (52) Specifically the one where Zoller said Shamansky was very adamant she always
wanted charges filed against me but as long as there was no further contact she’d have no need for charges and (53)
then immediately after saying that Shamansky filed a false stalking/phone harassment complaint against me for the
next eight (8) months. Shamansky was so adamant she wanted charges filed against even if she had to lie!
65). Further proof of Shamansky being “
obsessed” with me is the “prank” calls we got after she saw me in DC with my
mother to see her oncologist that stopped after I sent Shamansky the letter telling her my mother was dying of
breast,
bone and brain cancer and Zoller contacted me and I agreed never to contact Shamansky again (paragraph 4). That
lasted only a month and when Shamansky started stalking me by filing a false stalking/phone harassment complaint
against me (paragraph 64, link
53).
66). Now back to Martin and Cole testifying under oath I should undergo a “
psychological evaluation.” It should come
as no surprise a “
court appointed” psychologist (Kim Schirmer) concluded I wasn’t in need of any “psychological
counseling
,” let alone follow-up treatment.
67). That being said (paragraph 66) it should be obvious Martin and Cole had a much more “
sinister” motive for
wanting the court to order me to undergo a “
psychological evaluation” and that motive was to discredit me because I
began to question Martin and Zoller’s investigation of the false stalking/phone harassment complaint Shamansky filed
against me for eight (8) months that would’ve (and has) exposed the crimes Shamansky, Martin and Zoller committed
while that investigation was ongoing and even after it concluded.
68). It should be obvious my mental health never should’ve been questioned. As a matter of fact Shamansky is the one
whose mental health should’ve been questioned because she is the one who was (and to this day still is) exhibiting all
the symptoms of someone suffering from “
mental illnesses/psychological disorders.”
69). Psychologists have concluded
80-90% of women who become prostitutes are victims of incest and sexual abuse.
70). (
54) Psychologists have also concluded pathological lying is a “mental illness” and excessive lying is a common
symptom of several “mental illnesses.” (55) Pathological lying is associated with “antisocial/ psychopathic personality
disorder,” more commonly known as “psychopathic behavior.”
71). (
56) “Antisocial/Psychopathic personality disorder” is a personality disorder characterized by antisocial behavior
exhibiting a pervasive disregard for and the violation of the rights, feelings and safety of others.
72). I’ll start with paragraph 71 first. Shamansky tried to have me incarcerated on a false criminal charge and not be
there to care for my mother or grieve her death and also got Judy Young’s name/number out of the phone book and
proceeded to falsely accuse her of being an accomplice to the crime she was falsely accusing me of that could’ve
landed us both in jail where people are often raped and sometimes killed.
73). Now If that (paragraph 72) is not a pervasive disregard for and the violation of the rights, feelings and safety of
others than nothing is!
74). Now I’ll deal with paragraph 70. Shamansky is an excessive, pathological liar and proven so with her own recanted
under oath statements.
75). When Shamansky filed the false stalking/phone harassment complaint against me with the DP, i.e., Martin and
Zoller, she lied to them about the following:
. Shamansky lied about never working for an escort service. . Shamansky lied about never dating me.    
. Shamansky lied about having no need for charges as long as there was no further contact by me.
Immediately after saying that Shamansky stalked me by filing a false stalking/phone harassment complaint against me
for the next eight (8) months.
. Shamansky lied about receiving 2 harassing/hang up calls as being made from Judy
Young’s phone number three (3) months before my mother died.
. Shamansky lied about Judy Young and I being
related.
. Shamansky lied about me using Judy Young’s phone to stalk/ harass her. . Shamansky lied a 2nd time
about never dating me when she said she wanted to make sure the DP reports she filed said we never dated.
.
Shamansky lied a 2nd time about me stalking/harassing her by phone two (2) months before my mother died and she
was told there was no criminal offense.
. Shamansky lied a 3rd time about never dating me. This time she wanted it made “perfectly clear” she did not date,
never had dated or ever will date me and said she needed that as “
precise as possible.”
. Shamansky lied a 3rd time about me stalking/harassing her by phone just nineteen (19) days before my mother
died and when the DP refused to file charges against me she contacted her own attorney to pursue charges against
me on her own. No charges were ever filed against me.
. Shamansky lied a 4th time about receiving harassing/hang
up phone calls from my mother’s phone number for “
several months” dating back from 6-23-99.
76). That being said (paragraph 75, #1-11) I need to mention again Martin filed falsification charges against a man who
just lied about stealing and (paragraph 24, link
26) after pleading guilty he was facing up to six (6) months in prison
(paragraph 24, link
27).
77). During a deposition Shamansky committed (
57) felony perjury (statute 2921.11 of the ORC) in 2001.
(
58) I convinced the Disciplinary Counsel of the Supreme Court of Ohio she committed perjury. (59) The statute of
limitations on “felonies” is six (6) years. The statute of limitations froze when Shamansky left the state of Ohio in 2002
and moved to Colorado to avoid prosecution leaving five (5) years remaining to bring felony perjury charges against
her (link
59, division H).
78). Shamansky testified under oath before and after ending a dating relationship with me (
60) (she “vehemently”
denied ever was before being sworn under oath to tell the truth) she lied about the following:
(
61) ①. I asked her to move in with me ② and talked about marriage. (62) ③. I tried to see her by sitting in her
parking lot, ④ followed her, ⑤ left notes on her windshield, ⑥ called her to the point she had to have her phone
number changed ⑦ and I’d be at her doorstep as she was coming/going from her residence. (63) . I threatened her
physically when we dated. (64) ⑨. She called the Dublin Police to report me harassing her, ⑩ sitting out in her parking
lot and (65) ⑪ I would not leave her doorstep. (65) ⑫. I threatened her again by telling her I’d go through the phone
book and call all her family I could find in her maiden name and tell them I met her as a prostitute, ⑬ she called the
Dublin Police a 2nd time to report all that and ⑭ I sent her flowers at her mother’s residence. (66) ⑮. She said she
never called the DP and told them I was stalking her (contradicting Martin's affidavit of truth that says the DP began
investigating the complaint Shamansky filed claiming she was being stalked and harassed by me, paragraph 4, link 3)
and ⑯  said she told the DP (Martin and Zoller) I was her ex-boyfriend (67) a month before Zoller started filing DP
reports that say she told him we never dated. (68) . I said I hate all women and every time I see one in a dress it
makes me sick in a letter I sent her. (69) ⑱. She said the stalking/harassment complaint she filed against me (after I
agreed with Zoller not to contact her again, paragraph 4) from Nov. ‘98 to July ‘99 was by mail and ⑲ said If the DP
didn’t come get the letters they asked her to bring them in. Put them in an envelope or baggy. Try to keep as many
fingerprints as possible off of them. Enclose whatever envelope, whatever it came in and give it to them. That’s what
she remembers. (70) ⑳. I sat out in front of her house. Shamansky never called the DP to report that but did after I
sent her just one (1) letter, i.e., I posed more of an “
imminent threat” by mail than in person. (71) (21). I contacted her
aunts and uncles to tell them I met her as a prostitute and (22) told her our relationship wasn’t over until I said it was
over. (72) (23). I followed her to St. Ann’s hospital and left a note on her windshield that said she better call me when
her sister had a baby on 8-24-94.
79). Not only is all that (paragraph 78, #1-23) proven false with Shamansky’s “
vehement” denial of ever dating me,
i.e., she wanted it made “
perfectly clear” she did not date, never had dated or ever will date me and needed that as
precise as possible” (paragraph 78, link 60). (73) I can prove all that false with my sister’s ex-husband, a Dublin
Police officer since 1987 to present day.
80). If I’d done any of that (specifically threatened her physically, paragraph 78, link
63) and Shamansky had called the
Dublin Police to report it I would’ve been a subject of “
roll call” and a “BOLO” would’ve been put out on me. My sister’s
ex-husband patrolled Shamanky’s neighborhood and would’ve known if I’d done any of that and he would’ve called my
sister to ask her what was going on.
81). That’s thirty-four (34) times Shamansky lied and twenty-three (23) of those lies were told after she was sworn
under oath to tell the truth (and I'm not done yet with all of Shamansky's lies). That’s twenty-three (23) counts of
felony” perjury with each count carrying a five (5) year prison term. That’s one hundred and fifteen (115) years in
prison.
82). Tack on one (1) count of Shamansky tampering with evidence by altering the letters I sent her to incriminate me in
her own criminal activity (prostitution, paragraph 34) after Martin and Zoller’s investigation proved I was innocent and
Shamansky was guilty of menacing by stalking me and falsification and that’s another five (5) years in prison bringing
the "
grand total" prison time Shamansky is facing up to one hundred twenty (120) years.
83). The fact of the matter is some of the things Shamansky lied about me doing is what she did.
. Shamansky asked me to move in with her and talked about us getting married. My mother had just been
diagnosed with breast cancer. I wasn’t making any future plans. After I ended the relationship when I found out
Shamansky cheated on me with a man twice her age (that disgusted me) and prostituted herself the whole time we
dated (paragraph 27, link
29, paragraph 35, link 41) I’d see her driving past my house. . Shamansky would show
up at places where I’d be (she followed me).
. When I’d leave there would be a note on my windshield. . I also had
to have my pager number changed because she wouldn’t stop paging me.
. Shamansky would stop by my residence
to see me (I told my mother to tell her I wasn’t home).
. As stated previously, I would see Shamansky driving past my
house often.
. As stated previously, I ended the relationship when I found out Shamansky cheated on me with a man
twice her age (that disgusted me). I had no interest whatsoever in seeing Shamansky again after finding out she was
having sex with a man old enough to be her father and having “anything goes” sex with any man/woman two (2)
seconds after meeting them (as a prostitute) regardless of their appearance as long as they paid her $150/hr
prostituting fee.
. Shamansky called me after visiting her sister at St. Ann’s hospital when she had a baby and we
went out later that night.
84). (
74) My father, a retired claims adjuster, helped Shamansky get a better return on an insurance claim when she
totaled her Jeep. After that Shamansky sent my father a “very affectionate” thank you card signed, “Love, Tamara” for
helping her.
85). Notice the date on the envelope that card came in is dated Nov. 7, 1994. Shamansky’s sister had a baby on
August 24, 1994 and when she (lied and) said I left the note on her vehicle that said “
you better call me.” 2½ months
after Shamansky claims I did that she’s sending my father a card signed “
Love, Tamara.”
86). If I'd threatened Shamansky and had been “
abusive” towards her as she (lied and) claimed I was (paragraph 78)
Shamansky would not have had any contact with anyone in my family let alone send one something signed “
Love.”
87). If I had done any of what Shamansky said I did under oath (paragraph 78) it begs the question then why didn’t she
tell Martin and Zoller that instead of “
vehemently” denying ever having dated me (paragraph 78, link 60)?
88). To give you an idea how stupid it was for Martin and Zoller to cover up Shamansky’s crimes with crimes of their
own (paragraph 8-10, 50, 52-55) Shamansky testified under oath she told Martin and Zoller I was her ex-boyfriend
(paragraph 78, link
66) a month before Zoller began filing DP reports that say Shamansky told them we never dated
and “
vehemently” on one occasion, i.e., Shamansky wanted it made “perfectly clear” she did not date, never had
dated or ever will date me and needed that as “
precise as possible” (paragraph 78, link 60).
89). As stated previously, Shamansky also said under oath the stalking/harassment complaint she filed against me was
by mail (paragraph 78, link
69) when Zoller was filing DP reports that say Shamansky was accusing me of stalking/
harassing her by phone (paragraph 60, link
50).
90). So you see Martin and Zoller ruined my life by falsifying DP reports so I’d be perceived as a stalker after proving I
was innocent and Shamansky was the stalker (of me) for someone (Shamansky) who now says (under oath, no less)
they (Martin and Zoller) lied not her.
91). Now for a “
little window” into what an ungrateful human being Shamansky is. (75) She got a DUI when we dated
and she called me to bail her out. I didn’t have a credit card at the time so my mother gave me hers and told me to go
bail her out because we couldn’t leave her in jail.
92). Shamansky repaid that “
act of kindness” (paragraph 91) back (but not the $170 bail money) by trying to have me
incarcerated on a false criminal charge and not be there to care for my mother who was dying of
breast, bone and
brain cancer
(including just 19 days before her death, paragraph 17, link 19).
93). (
76) Shamansky also admitted under oath I helped her out financially when we dated (77) including paying for and
fixing repairs to her vehicle.
94). I treated Shamansky like “
GOLD” when we dated and on more than one occasion she told me she loved me (and
why she signed the card to my father, “
Love, Tamara," paragraph 84, link 74).
95). Shamansky’s lies and attempts to have me incarcerated are rooted in a “
personal vendetta” she has against me
because of the harsh way I ended our relationship when I found out she cheated on me with a man twice her age
(that disgusted me) and prostituted herself the whole time we dated.
96). (
78) If you've ever seen the movie “She's the One” with Jennifer Aniston and Edward Burns his (Burns) character
is trying to tell his brother the woman he's in love with (Burns ex) and wants to leave his wife (Jennifer Aniston) to marry
was a “hooker” and why he (Burns) dumped her and his brother says, “I can't marry a hooker!
97). That (paragraph 96) is exactly how I felt when I found out Shamansky prostituted herself the whole time we dated.
The fact that didn't deter the guy she married and she was prostituting herself less than six (6) months before she got
married tells me he was one of her “
clients/John's” when she was a prostitute. A fascinating story they can tell their
child and grandkids about how they met.
98). I’m not done documenting Shamansky lying about me. Her next batch of lies come from a website she created
(
79) (www.tamarashamansky.com) about me and further evidence she's suffering from multiple “mental illnesses” and
multiple “
antisocial/psychopathic personality disorders.”
. I parked outside her house to watch her (not true, see paragraph 3). . My allegations of Shamansky being a
prostitute are based on no facts or anything of merit (
80) (proving to have merit with her own five (5) under oath “self-
incriminating” objections (81) when she was asked questions related to her working for an escort service.. In 1998
I pled guilty to drug trafficking/distributing in case #98CR-000218.
. In 2002 I pled guilty to drug trafficking and
retaliation in case #02CR-006676.
. In 2003 I pled guilty to drug trafficking and resisting arrest in case #2006 TRD
150783 ("
TRD" is a court code for traffic cases) and served a year in jail after pleading guilty to #6, 7.
. In 2005 I pled guilty to menacing by stalking and tampering with the US postal system in DC and served a year
in jail in DC after pleading guilty to #9, 10.
. In 2007 I was charged with speeding in a school zone, reckless
operation of a vehicle and
my vehicle was repossessed after I was cited for speeding and reckless opp (#12, 13).  
. Shamansky listed two (2) e-mail addresses, (tamarashamansky@hotmail.com), (Help@tamarashamansky.com),
and said she could be contacted if anyone needed advice in dealing with a stalker.
99). (
82) When Shamansky updated her website she removed those three (3) false drug trafficking convictions
(paragraph 98, #3-4, 6).
100). (
83) The Franklin County courts (website) disposition of that Perry Township traffic stop shows that stop occured
in 2006 (not 2003) and I was charged with speeding (59 in a 45 mph zone) and paid the fine/waiver of guilt by mail.  
101). If Shamansky was telling the truth and "
drugs were found in plain sight" and I was charged with drug trafficking
and resisting arrest the Franklin County courts disposition of that case would be I was able to deal that down to just a
speeding ticket with no jail time and I was able to do that without a lawyer.
102). But, as evident by Shamansky's website, she said I pled guilty to the charges (drug trafficking/resisting arrest)
and served a year in jail.
103). I was delivering flowers on “
Mother's Day” (the date on that ticket is the 2nd Sunday in May and always
Mother's Day”). In Shamansky's scenario/lie I was “cruising around,” “getting high” and “fighting with the police.”
104). Shamansky (lied and) said I pled guilty to menacing by stalking and tampering with the US postal system in DC
and served a year in jail in DC. That lie is “
mind boggling” seeing as how Martin himself can testify on my behalf there
isn't any truth to any of that.
105). If you e-mail the two (2) addresses (
84) (tamarashamansky@hotmail.com), (85) (Help@tamarashamansky.com)
Shamansky lists on her website that she says anyone can contact her if they need advice in dealing with a stalker they
will be returned as “
undeliverable.”
106). That’s fifty (
50) times Shamansky has lied and the majority of them are about me. That goes above and beyond
excessive, compulsive, pathological lying, i.e., someone exhibiting common symptoms of several “
mental illnesses
(paragraph 70, link
54) and suffering from several “antisocial/psychopathic personality disorders” (paragraph 70,
link
55, paragraph 71, link 56).  
107). The craziest thing is Shamansky lies about things that can be easily proven false with court records. Just like the
case I mentioned previously, i.e., case #2006 TRD 150783 and the case that Martin can testify I was never charged
with menacing by stalking, tampering with the US postal system and served a year in jail in DC in 2005.


108). It needs to be pointed out that Shamansky wouldn’t incriminate herself in her own criminal activity (prostitution)
but had no problem falsely incriminating me in it, no problem falsely accusing me of stalking/ harassing her by phone,
no problem getting Judy Young’s name/phone number out of the phone book and falsely incriminating her of being an
accomplice to the false stalking/phone harassment complaint she filed against me for no other reason than we shared
the same last name and no problem falsely accusing Zoller of “
acting alone” in falsifying DP reports to read we never
dated and I was stalking/harassing her by phone after she told him (Zoller) and Martin we dated, I was stalking/
harassing her by mail and she didn’t know who was stalking/harassing her by phone.
109). Martin and Zoller chose to protect and ruin my life for someone (Shamansky) who now says they lied in the DP
documents they filed after she told them the truth at the worst time in my life, i.e., when my mother was dying of
breast,
bone and brain cancer and then they continued even after her death instead of respecting my family’s privacy all the
while knowing I was innocent and Shamansky was lying to them and guilty of menacing by stalking me and falsification.
110). On her website Shamansky also has the “
audacity” to cite my mother and “scold” me by saying (quoting),
Bill E. Young, I am sure your mother would be very proud of you.”
111). Are you f***ing kidding me? This from the woman who tried to have me incarcerated on a false stalking/phone
harassment complaint and not be there to care for my mother or grieve her death and she thinks my mother would side
with her in doing that to me.
112). That (paragraph 111) more than anything else I've cited proves Shamansky is a “
psychopath” and severely
mentally ill/disturbed.”
113). As a mother herself with a son that (paragraph 110-111) is equivalent to Shamansky saying she’d side with a
prostitute falsely accusing her son of stalking/phone harassment with the intent of having him incarcerated and not be
there to care for her or grieve her death if she was dying of a “
terminal illness.” That’s just further evidence
Shamansky suffers from "
mental illnesses/antisocial/psychopathic personality disorders.”
114). (
86) Shamansky was referred to as “good people” in a TV segment on the Christian Broadcast Networks 700
club TV show.
115). (
87) On her website Shamansky cites a Bible verse that she says has helped her past/present (Philippians 4:13),
“I can
do all things through Christ/Jesus who strengthens me.” That would have to include stalking me for eight (8)
months by filing a false stalking/phone harassment complaint against me with the intent of having me incarcerated and
not be there to care for my mother and then she continued even after her death.
116). Given what Shamansky did when my mother was dying of
breast, bone and brain cancer instead of respecting
my (family’s) privacy it’s safe to say Shamansky doesn’t have a religious bone in her body and “
googled” that Bible
verse (
Philippians 4:13, paragraph 115, link 85) or she’d also be familiar with the following Bible verses and honor
them too:
. Matthew 7:12 (the “Golden Rule”): So in everything, do to others what you would have them do to you, for this
sums up the Law and the Prophets.
. James 5: 16 (88) (Translated by the 12 steps of AA): Admitted to God, to ourselves and to another human being
the exact nature of our wrongs.
. Matthew 5:23, 24 (Translated by the 12 steps of AA): Made a list of all persons we had harmed and became willing
to make amends to them all.
. Luke 6:38 (Translated by the 12 steps of AA): Made direct amends to such people wherever possible, except when
to do so would injure them or others.
. Acts 8:22: Repent, therefore, of the wickedness of yours, and pray to the Lord that, if possible, the intent of your
heart may be forgiven you.
. Proverbs 6:16-19: 16 There are six (6) things the LORD hates, seven (7) that are detestable to him: 17 haughty
eyes, a lying tongue, hands that shed innocent blood,
18 a heart that devises wicked schemes, feet that are quick to
rush into evil,
19 a false witness who pours out lies and a person who stirs up conflict in the community.
117). Shamansky is guilty of five (5) out of six (6) of the things the Lord hates, seven (7) that are detestable to him and
she claims the Lord’s son, Christ Jesus, gave her the strength to file a false stalking/phone harassment complaint
against me with the intent of having me incarcerated and not be there to care for my mother and then she continued
even after her death. That's equivalent to Shamansky Christ Jesus gave her the strength to do things his father, the
Lord, hates and are detestable to him.
118). (
89) Christians have a word to describe people who think the way Shamansky does and it’s “CHARLATAN!”
119). In a subsequent case the Columbus Police [hereinafter “
CP”] brought against me on Shamansky’s behalf they
alleged I posted copies of Shamansky’s deposition on the building where her husband worked but didn’t turn those
documents over to me during “
discovery.”
120). If those documents (copies of Shamansky’s deposition the CP alleged I posted on the building where her
husband worked) were in the possession of the Franklin County Prosecutors [hereinafter “
FCP”] office they were
required by law to turn them over to me during “
discovery” but failed to do so.
121). That being said (paragraph 120) the FCP office violated the “
tampering with evidence” statute (2921.12) of the
ORC (paragraph 9, link
8) by concealing documents with the purpose of denying me their availability as evidence in a
criminal proceeding. Under the “
tampering with evidence” statute, section A, division 1, that’s a “3rd degree felony.”
122). The judge, Lisa Sadler [hereinafter “
LS”], ordered me to undergo five (5) years of ”psychological counseling
and when a “
court appointed” mental health examiner concluded I didn’t need any “psychological counseling” LS
ordered me to undergo six (6) months of “
domestic violence” counseling.
123). (
90) LS received a campaign contribution for re-election from Shamansky’s relatives law partner.
124). I was served with a protection order and interestingly enough it says I pose an “
imminent threat” to Shamansky
despite the fact I live approximately 2,000 miles away and yet the CP waited five (5) months to approach me regarding
me allegedly posting copies of Shamansky’s deposition on the building where her husband worked (at the time I lived
within ten (10) miles of Shamansky) after I obtained evidence of the crimes Shamansky, Martin and Zoller committed
while Martin and Zoller investigated the false stalking/ phone harassment complaint Shamansky filed against me, i.e., I
pose an “
imminent threat” to Shamansky from 2,000 miles away but not when I’m just ten (10) miles away.
125). (
91) The CP also lied by claiming they confiscated one hundred and two (102) grams of marijuana from me with
the intent of stealing property from me that was purchased with the inheritance I received from my mother’s estate in
order to carry out the “
personal vendetta” Shamansky has against me for dumping her so harshly when I found out  
she cheated on me with a man twice her age (that disgusted me) and prostituted herself the whole time we dated.
126). (
92) Only three (3) photos were taken (93) of the alleged one hundred and two grams of marijuana and the one
that would be the “bulk” of that is a picture of my dishes/glasses. The other two (2) pictures are less than a gram of
(
94) stems and (95) seeds.
127). An assistant FCP prosecutor, (Stephanie Gussler, [hereinafter “
SG”]) lied and said (96) I purchased that
property with the proceeds from drug dealing to secure it’s forfeiture, i.e. (97) she violated the "theft" (by deception)
statute (2913.02) of the ORC.
128). (
98) In a forfeiture hearing SG lied and said I was given proper notice of that hearing. (99) SG contacted the
Public Defender’s office (with whom I had no affiliation) two (2) weeks after that hearing was held. SG had access to my
address through the probation dept. but chose not to seek it out to inform me of that hearing.
129). (
100) I filed a theft complaint with the Internal Affairs division of the CP dept. regarding that property. Page 2,
paragraph 2 says, “As the total of said items exceeds $500 this, as I see it, would constitute a charge of felony theft.”
130). (
101) Despite that (paragraph 129) proving the complaint I filed was one of theft the CP, i.e., Internal Affairs dept.
Sgt. Chantay Boxill badge #5199, violated the tampering with evidence statute of the ORC by changing my complaint to
my property was “mishandled” and then deemed that complaint as “unfounded.”
131). As evident by pg. 2, paragraph 2 of the complaint I filed (paragraph 129, link
100) my complaint was the theft of
my property not the “
mishandling” of it. It goes without saying it's “beyond laughable” to believe that I had a problem
with the handling of my property rather than the theft/non return of it.
132). (
102) The City of Columbus was sued by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio,
Eastern Division United States of America because the CP failed to adequately accept citizen complaints of misconduct
and investigate alleged misconduct.
133). In that lawsuit (paragraph 132, link
102) the CP was accused of failing to establish a procedure where citizen
complaints are adequately investigated and have failed to fairly and adequately adjudicate or review citizen complaints.
134). That (paragraph 132-133) accurately depicts how the CP handled my complaint of theft by changing it to fit their
agenda, i.e., covering up the misconduct of their officers.
135). I filed a lawsuit in Federal Court in an attempt to get my property back that the CP (Stan Latta badge #5124,
Casey Baehr badge #1648) stole from me. I was denied the right to depose those two CP officers because the city
attorney, David Peterson [hereinafter “
DaP”], (103) lied in a motion to prevent me from deposing them by claiming he
wasn’t obligated to inform me of the date all of us were to be deposed at my Michael View Court address because I
didn’t inform the court I changed my address and the judge granted that motion (102) despite the courts own
documentation proving I did inform them of my new address ten (10) months prior to DaP filing that motion.
136). So you see it’s just been one liar/criminal after another, i.e.,
police officers, attorneys and judges. Ironically the
same group of people who patronized Shamansky when she was a prostitute.
137). (
104) The DP and CP’s loyalty to Shamansky is based upon her connection to a “prostitution ring” (as a
prostitute) whose clients included politicians, judges, police officers, prominent people, (105) doctors, lawyers and
stockbrokers because she can name them (106) (and has threatened to do so, i.e., a crime under the "Extortion"
statute, 2905.11 of the ORC), her relative being a former DCMC referee and her husband being a Columbus attorney
who is the “
go to” attorney when anyone in Franklin/DC government/law enforcement find themselves on the wrong
side of the law.
138). (
107) That attorneys (Sam Shamansky) clients include politicians, judges, police officers, lawyers (including two
in the Franklin County prosecutor’s office, (
108) Angela Canepa (her son murdered a disabled man by burning him
alive) and (109) Trent Turner), etc., etc..
139). Sam Shamansky’s clients also include accused/convicted pedophiles (including cops), convicted murderers
(including cops) and (
110) a terrorist (Abdirahman Sheik Mohamud) who plotted an attack with the intent of killing
Americans in the U.S. in the name of ISIS.
140). Instead of protecting my rights under the laws of the state of Ohio after I was proven innocent of stalking/
harassing Shamansky by phone, i.e., she committed a serious criminal offense against me with the intent of having me
incarcerated with the intent of preventing me from caring for my dying mother and then Shamansky continued even
after her death, Martin and Zoller protected someone (Shamansky) their investigation proved was a criminal who
testified under oath she wasn't the criminal Martin and Zoller were the criminals (paragraph 78, link
66, 67).
141). The DP, i.e., Martin and Zoller, and the CP protected a criminal/Shamansky whose family/relative defends
accused/convicted pedophiles, convicted murderers and an ISIS terrorist instead of a falsely accused person (me)
caring for his mother dying of
breast, bone and brain cancer and then they continued even after her death.
142). You hear about cases where DNA has freed wrongly convicted people after years of incarceration. That’s not the
case with me in the false stalking/phone harassment complaint Shamansky filed against me in DC. Martin and Zoller
knew Shamansky lied to them about everything from day one (1) and continued to waist taxpayer dollars investigating
the false stalking/phone harassment complaint Shamansky filed against me.
143). Martin has a history of pulling over female motorists under “
false pretenses” so he can “check them out.” He
did that to a friend of mine whose ex-husband happens to be an ex-Marion County Deputy Sheriff.
144). That being said (paragraph 143) the only logical explanation for Martin instructing Zoller, as the lead detective
investigating the false stalking/phone harassment complaint Shamansky filed against me, to falsify DP reports to
incriminate me of what Shamansky falsely accused me of after each time she accused me of it and I was proven
innocent is he (Martin) was attracted to her (Shamansky) and couldn’t stop thinking about her having “
anything goes
sex with anyone as a prostitute and wishing he could have sex with her seeing as how her only requirement in a sex
partner was their ability to pay her $150 (Shamansky's prostituting fee).
145). What other explanation could there possibly be for two (2) police officers (Martin and Zoller) sworn to uphold the
law to choose instead to intentionally and deliberately ruin a falsely accused persons (my) life when they were caring
for their mother dying of a “
terminal illness,” i.e., breast, bone and brain cancer, for a criminal (Shamansky) whose
sole motivation” for falsely accusing me of a crime with the intent of having me incarcerated and not be there to care
for my mother or grieve her death was “revenge” because I dumped her when I found out she cheated on me with a
man old enough to be her father (twice her age)?
146). If you look at Shamansky’s website (
www.tamarashamansky.com) about me she said (quoting), “now I have
been forced to take action to put this criminal (me) behind bars for a much longer time than one (1) year
.”
When I saw that I ignored it (
111) until the DP began stalking/harassing my sister again (just like they did by
contacting my sister's “abusive” ex-boyfriend after Shamansky's phone records proved I was innocent and she was
guilty of menacing by stalking (me) for eight (8) months and falsification) wanting to talk to me.
147). After my sister contacted me to tell me the DP was harassing her again I sent them evidence of Martin and Zoller
covering up crimes Shamansky committed against me (with the intent of having me incarcerated and not be there to
care for my mother and then she continued even after her death) with crimes of their own and (
112) provided them
(DP) with my contact information at the bottom of the DP report Zoller falsified the same exact day Shamansky's phone
records proved I was innocent and she was guilty of menacing by stalking me and falsification by filing a false stalking/
phone harassment complaint against me for eight (8) months and said I would speak with them but first we were going
to discuss what Martin and Zoller did to me after they proved Shamansky filed the false stalking/phone harassmwent
complaint against me for eight (8) months.
148). It should come as no surprise the DP never contacted me after receiving that (paragraph 147) and stopped
harassing my sister.
149). Once again I had done nothing and Shamansky says she was “
forced” to take action against me. That’s exactly
what she did when she stalked me by filing the false stalking/phone harassment complaint against me for eight (8)
months.
150). Now the prosecutor will argue I'm stalking Shamansky but that's not true. All I’ve ever wanted is the life I had
before Martin and Zoller decided to ruin that life instead of doing their jobs as law enforcement officers and filing
criminal charges against Shamansky for violating the menacing by stalking (me) and falsification statutes of the ORC
by stalking me for eight (8) months by filing a false stalking/phone harassment complaint against me with the intent of
having me incarcerated and not be there to care for my mother dying of
breast, bone and brain cancer and then
they (Shamansky, Martin and Zoller) continued even after her death.
151). The prosecutor will also have to argue Shamansky deserved (
113) one of those “professional favors Martin
suspended a DP officer for giving to a fellow DP officers daughter that violated DP dept. policies and ethics violations,
because she only committed those crimes against me because she was trying to turn her life around from being a
prostitute/previous criminal activity and were it not for that she never would've committed those crimes against me and
for that reason they should be overlooked.
152). I, on the other hand, should be charged with a crime (that Shamansky actually committed against me) for sending
Shamansky letters despite the fact they were sent after I was proven innocent and she was guilty of menacing by
stalking (me) and falsification, Martin stalked my sister and DP reports should be falsified to incriminate me of sending
those letters when Shamansky was falsely accusing me of stalking/phone harassment with the intent of having me
incarcerated and not be there to care for my dying mother and then she continued even after her death so it would
appear as if I “
provoked” the false stalking/phone harassment complaint Shamansky filed against me.
153). If I had been dealing with honest police officers instead of two (2) criminals with badges (Martin and Zoller)
Shamansky would’ve been charged with menacing by stalking (me) and falsification after her phone records (illegally
obtained using Zoller’s falsified DP reports as the “
probable cause” to obtain them) proved I was innocent and
Shamansky was guilty of menacing by stalking (me) and falsification.
154). And remember (as stated previously twice), (
114) Martin himself filed criminal charges against a man who
committed the same crime Shamansky did (falsification) by just lying to a DP officer about stealing and (115) after
pleading guilty he faced up to six (6) months in prison.
155). Shamansky lied to a DP officer for eight (8) months about me stalking/harassing her by phone with the intent of
having me incarcerated and was never charged with a crime for doing so.
156). It goes without saying if you’re going to file falsification charges against someone who just lies to a DP officer
about stealing then you’re going to file falsification charges against someone who lies with the intent of having
someone incarcerated unless you're dealing with a corrupt police officer/dept. like I was.
157). In fact, of the two (2) if Martin and Zoller were going to give one of those "
professional favors" (that violated DP
policies and ethics violations) to someone who committed the crime of falsification it’s the person who just lied to a DP
officer about stealing not the one (Shamansky) who lied to a DP officer with the intent of having someone incarcerated.
158). Martin and Zoller even had the option of walking away from Shamansky after her phone records proved I was
innocent and she was guilty of menacing by stalking me for eight (8) months and falsification.
159). Think about it… What do you think the odds are I sent Shamansky’s husband a letter the same exact day their
phone records proved I was innocent and Shamansky was guilty of menacing by stalking (me) and falsification by filing
a false stalking/phone harassment complaint against me for eight (8) months when I thought this ended eight (8)
months earlier when I agreed never to contact Shamansky again (paragraph 4)? The answer to that is about a
gazillion” to one!!!
160). I should’ve received “
high praise” for the sacrifices I made caring for my mother the last two (2) years of her life.
Instead two criminals with badges (Martin and Zoller) felt instead of respecting my privacy with the recent death of my
mother my life should be ruined to protect a criminal (Shamansky) and (
116) I should also be perceived as capable of
“violence” towards Shamansky and (117) suffering from a “psychological disorder” to protect someone (Shamansky)
who is actually exhibiting all of the symptoms of someone who is suffering from “
mental illnesses/antisocial/
psychopathic personality disorders
.”
161). This has destroyed many personal/dating relationships. I would’ve liked to have gotten married and started a
family but this has ruined that for me and it never should’ve happened to me in the first place and wouldn’t have were it
not for two (2) police officers (Martin and Zoller) who chose to be criminals with badges instead of enforcing the law.
162). This has also destroyed my family relationships. I haven’t celebrated Thanksgiving or Christmas with my family
for over ten (10) years now because of this.
163). I watch shows like “
Undercover Boss” and “Bar Rescue” and see the kindness of people helping others better
their lives and it always brings me to tears the way the Undercover Bosses/John Taffer change their lives in such a
positive way. And they don’t have to do what they do. They just do it out of the “
goodness of their hearts.”
164). Watching those reality shows always reminds me of the “
cruel," “inhumane” things Martin and Zoller did to me
instead of respecting my privacy during my mother’s illness and then even after her death and their profession
requires them to protect the victims of crime not turn them into criminals to protect a criminal (Shamansky) by falsifying
police reports so the criminal would be perceived as the victim.
165). Martin and Zoller are not police officers they are criminals with badges and Shamansky is no victim. She’s a
criminal!!! And Martin is a “
pervert!”
166). If the prosecutor argues I should’ve fought the criminal charge Martin filed against me after I was “
provoked” into
what I did by Martin stalking my sister by contacting her “
abusive” ex-boyfriend instead of respecting my family’s
privacy with the recent death of our mother ask yourself why should I have had to when Shamansky should’ve been
charged with the crimes he (Martin) proved she committed against me with her phone records three (3) months earlier?
167). Also know that I worked (and still do) at a golf course and make around $18,000 annually whereas Shamansky
and her husband owned their own mortgage company (and I believe they still do, U.S./Denver mortgage) when she was
falsely accusing me of stalking/harassing her by phone.
168). As you hear this case I want you to remember that caring for my mother required me to take her to chemotherapy
treatments (often carrying her to and from bed), pick up medications for her, sponge bathe her, help her to and from
the bathroom (including wiping her) and change adult diapers when she became bedridden and instead of respecting
my (family’s) privacy during that time Martin and Zoller felt Shamansky trying to turn her life around from being a
prostitute/previous criminal activity (by falsely accusing me of committing crimes against her) far outweighed me being
falsely accused of stalking her (Shamansky, while she was stalking me) with the intent of having me incarcerated and
not be there to care for my mother and then she continued even after her death.  
169). Also remember the prosecutor will be arguing the real criminal in this is me, the person Shamansky falsely
accused of stalking her while she was stalking me.
170). The last thing I want you to think about (besides what Shamansky, Martin and Zoller did to me when my mother
was dying and then they continued even after her death) is imagine if a friend, a loved one or even you found yourself
accused of a crime would you want this prosecutor or Martin and Zoller showing up on your doorstep seeing that
justice was served after knowing what they did to me after proving I was innocent and Shamansky was guilty of
menacing by stalking me and falsification when my mother was dying of
breast, bone and brain cancer and then they
continued even after her death because Shamansky was related to a former DCMC referee (paragraph 3, link
1) and
Martin was attracted to her?
171). My life is in your hands. After hearing my side of the story I have all the faith in the world you will do the right
thing and acquit me.
172). After all we need members of our law enforcement communities to be held to a "
higher standard" not think they
are above the law as people like Martin and Zoller think they are.