On 1-22-99 Tamara Shamansky wanted it made "perfectly clear" she did not date, never had dated and never will
date me and needed that as "precise as possible."
On 7-12-01 Tamara Shamansky said the following after she was sworn under oath to tell the truth (from her
deposition, in it's entirety, #4 on the Home page).
- We had a boyfriend/girlfriend relationship.
- We'd go out all the time with my family.
- After she broke up with me I’d try to see her by sitting in her parking lot, follow her, leave notes on her wind-
shield, called her to the point she had to have her phone number changed and at times be at her doorstep as
she was coming/going from her residence.
- I threatened her “physically” during our relationship.
- During our relationship she called the Dublin Police Dept. to report I was harassing her, sitting in her parking lot
and would not leave her doorstep.
- During the end when she broke up with me I threatened if she didn’t continue to see me I’d go through the
phone book and contact her family and tell them she was earning a living as an escort/prostitute and I actually
went partially through with that “threat” and contacted some of her aunts and uncles and told her it wasn’t over
until I said it was over and left a note on her windshield when her sister had a baby (8-24-94) at St. Ann’s
hospital that said “you better call me.”
- Tamara lied under oath when claiming the stalking complaint she filed against me from 11-21-98 to 6-23-99
was by mail. The Delaware Police reports David and Tamara filed are "irrefutable" proof they were falsely
accusing me of stalking them by phone not by mail.
That is "irrefutable" documented proof Tamara Shamansky committed felony perjury after she was sworn under oath
to tell the truth.
I can prove she committed perjury with my sister's ex-husband, a Dublin Police officer since 1987 to present day.
I NEVER did #'s 3-6 or Tamara would've reported all that on 1-22-99 instead of wanting it made "perfectly clear" she
did not date, never had dated and never will date me and needed that as "precise as possible."
I have "irrefutable" documented proof Tamara Shamansky lied twice when filing a stalking complaint against me.
She admitted under oath they (David and Tamara) lied when reporting their caller ID recorded my mother's name and
registered phone number for "several months" and never determined who was calling them and hanging up.
"Irrefutable" proof of the Delaware Police Dept.'s complicity in criminal activity on behalf of David and Tamara is in
that 6-23-99 report the officer's (Zoller) entry reads as if he witnessed my mother's name and number on David and
Tamara's caller ID for himself and then used that falsified police report to "illegally" obtain a warrant for their phone
records that ultimately proved my innocence and their guilt in violating the falsification and menacing by stalking
sections of the Ohio Revised Code when they falsely accused me of stalking/harassing them by phone.
Further "irrefutable" proof of the Delaware Police Dept.'s complicity in criminal activity is the officer (Russ Martin) who
covered up David and Tamara's crimes/lies (falsification, menacing by stalking) that they committed with the intent of
having me arrested and incarcerated when my mother was dying/died of breast/bone/brain cancer charged the
Delaware man mentioned on my Home page with falsification for lying about stealing drugs and he pled guilty and was
facing six months jail/prison time and a $1,000 fine for doing so.
It's a "no-brainer" if you charge someone with falsification for lying about stealing drugs you charge someone with
falsification for lying with the intent of having someone arrested and incarcerated on a false complaint.
David and Tamara were guilty of violating the menacing by stalking section of the Ohio Revised Code too.
Falsely accusing me of stalking/harassing them by phone with the intent of having me arrested and incarcerated when
my mother was dying/died was "mentally distressful" to my family and I.
Having proven the crimes David and Tamara committed against me were covered up it's worth noting again a relative
of David and Tamara's was a former Delaware County Municipal Court referee/judge.
When Russ Martin confronted David and Tamara on 6-23-99 with their phone records and showed them neither Judy
Young or my mother's phone numbers were among the numbers listed in their phone records Tamara admitted she
lied originally when she denied ever being associated with an escort service (she admitted that under oath) and
changed her 1-22-99 story of wanting it made "perfectly clear" she did not date, never had dated and never will date
me and needed that as "precise as possible" to I was a client/John when she (Tamara) was a prostitute and our
relationship never went beyond that to garner "sympathy."
When asked (under oath) about that "directly" Tamara admitted she lied when "connecting" me to her in prostitution.
As mentioned previously Tamara admitted under oath we had a boyfriend/girlfriend relationship and we'd go out all the
time for dinner and drinks with my family.
Further "irrefutable" documented proof I wasn't "connected" to Tamara in prostitution is she referenced our
relationship as a "boyfriend/girlfriend" one immediately after admitting she worked for an escort service.
She could have stuck with her 6-23-99 story I was a client/John when she (Tamara) was a prostitute and our
relationship never went beyond that having admitted she worked for an escort service but DID NOT and instead
admitted (under oath) she lied.
Page 3, "MORE (website) LIES."